|
|
Post by General Powell on May 8, 2004 21:39:20 GMT -5
Delegate Martian Nation-States of DEN: Any participating region found to be in violation of the rules put forth by this summit will be punished and sanctioned by the remaining members. This includes groups (i.e. if DEN is violating these rules, then all WAR members must suffer the consequences, i.e. invasion by all remaining members) and alliances.
|
|
|
|
Post by General Powell on May 8, 2004 21:40:23 GMT -5
Delegate Blackbird1 of the Proletariat Coalition and the RLA: Since it seems to have been agreed that each issue shall be taken one by one and not in its totality, I would say, not commenting on the Merits of the 4th above statement by Martian Nation-States, that American style arbitration is traditionally done by each party picking an arbitrator, and said two arbitrators agree on a nuetral third arbitrator, who arbitrates any hearing (without the first two doing anything but having picked the third).
|
|
|
|
Post by General Powell on May 8, 2004 21:41:12 GMT -5
Delegate Martian Nation-States of DEN: The 3x1x3 Arbitration proposal was designed to ensure that the arbitrator does not gain too much power.
Since it is assumed that in a worse-case-scenario, each side will be split 3x3 over a policy. The arbitrator does not select his own policy, but must choose one of the two put forth.
Example:
A Better Colonial Ambition completely violates Summit rules in Muropia. Three representatives from the raiders decide that the punishment should be no raiding for 28 days and the three defenders think that the Global Alliance should invade. An arbitrator can't say "50 days, no raiding and Southern South must die". He can only choose policies set forth by actual Global members.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skywalker1 on May 12, 2004 19:35:49 GMT -5
I have a suggestion. Why don't we have a judges chambers on this site, have a set of judges some defender other invader, if this happens.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Heights on May 12, 2004 19:52:53 GMT -5
That would really turn the Summit into an entirely new organization, something like the UN (the actual UN, not the NS version...). I personally wouldn't mind this, its just that it would create many problems, such as - Who are admins?
- Will everyone be fair?
- Will this be used to gather intel?
Like I said, I wouldn't mind it; I think it would be great to better settle our differences. But the truth is, constant rivals will not be able to work together on such a project. |
|
|
|
Post by Chessalavakia on May 13, 2004 17:56:35 GMT -5
But does either side want more rules? To be completly honest I have access to many forums I can't think of one orgainsation that is actually getting what they want. ADN want the region ADN to begiven to them and a few others.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Heights on May 13, 2004 18:09:13 GMT -5
We've had one meeting so far, and Sunday's meeting may create trouble. I myself will not ba able to attend (again...), and there have been some leadership changes in DEN, so they will more than likely have a different delegate.
|
|
