Gen Powell (Co-Host): But ALH was lost to TITO, GLA and the RRA by that point.
Gen Powell (Co-Host): The mod confirmed all that I have told you, and reinstated RS' nation.
Democratic Donkeys (ADN): When you don't remove that nation from the ban list
Gen Powell (Co-Host): And when have you ever heard a single ejection constituting a griefing?
Gamia (INDEP): DD does have a point. Powell
Gen Powell (Co-Host): No question. But DELETION?
Democratic Donkeys (ADN): But still against the rules.
Gen Powell (Co-Host): RS' nation was near the 500 million make at that point.
Gen Powell (Co-Host): No other natives were ejected, and the mistake was an innocent one.
Gen Powell (Co-Host): RS was deleted within 24 hours of the acquisition, the password cleared and the mission labelled a "griefing."
Gen Powell (Co-Host): RS forgot to remove the old delegate from the ban list.
Gen Powell (Co-Host): He immediately sent the new password to all natives and the ejected delegate (who had been inactive for nearly a week.)
Gen Powell (Co-Host): Our chosen delegate, Rarely Steamboats, evicted a single nation--the native delegate.
Gen Powell (Co-Host): DEN had acquired the region of A Liberal Haven several weeks ago.
Gen Powell (Co-Host): For a quick example:
Gen Powell (Co-Host): Because little issues lead to nation deletion in the hands of the mods, Delegate Equility.
Gamia (INDEP): I think the contention is between "little" mod reports and "not-so-little" mod reports
equility(ADN/Equilism): but that's my opinion
equility(ADN/Equilism): Well that may be so, but I can't really see the use of this issue, I don't think it has any use to discuss every litlle mod report on a forum
Gamia (INDEP): Can we conclude discussion on this point then?
Gen Powell (Co-Host): Agreed, Delegate DD. if the player accused can't make the effort to respond to the accusation, then file the mod report.
Gen Powell (Co-Host): You might be surprised, Delegate Equility. The purpose of the GS Summit is to lay out ground rules which we, as players, can agree to maintain. The accord we reach will be presented as a supplement to the ongoing debate on raider rules in the NS Forum.
Democratic Donkeys (ADN): Just so "I wasn't able to get on to discuss" isn't a valid excuse
Democratic Donkeys (ADN): Yes, that's why I asked that
equility(ADN/Equilism): I don't see all groups keeping to this anyway
Gamia (INDEP): Sounds good to me
Gen Powell (Co-Host): It would, Delegate DD.
Gen Powell (Co-Host): This will be important for new raider and defender alliances coming into the game, and will prevent much heartache owing to N00B1E violations.
Democratic Donkeys (ADN): If discussion ocurred on a rule infraction and nobody came on to discuss it would the report be filed by default?
Blackbird (RLA): If this is agreed on, have we another issue?
Gen Powell (Co-Host): Some will be clear, others will not. But we would agree to address this as players in the neutral forum prior to the report.
Democratic Donkeys (ADN): Neither do I. But if it become common practice then we'll have to adapt.
Gen Powell (Co-Host): This is designed to filter which allegations become mod reports, Delegate Equility.
equility(ADN/Equilism): unless it's unclear if a rule is broken or not
equility(ADN/Equilism): Yes, but I don't see the use of discussing mod reports.
Democratic Donkeys (ADN): Yes, I agree. Equility?
Blackbird (RLA): I find Mr Salai most agreeable.
Gamia (INDEP): GRD agrees
Gen Powell (Co-Host): Are we in tentative agreement, delegates? With the proviso that the ADN must receive further information on the NSI before recommending this to their governing council?
Gen Powell (Co-Host): I apologize if I didn't, Delegate Blackbird. I had mentioned this was proposed by the defenders, but not as specifically.
Blackbird (RLA): Ah, had you said this before we bagan, it would have been most enlightening.
Gamia (INDEP): As long as Mr. Salai would protect our IPs
Gamia (INDEP): As would the GRD
Gen Powell (Co-Host): When this issue was first presented, it was presented by the EAA and TITO as a request to have alleged defender violations reviewed "in house" before getting the mods involved. WAR and IAN believes this should apply to all alleged violations. We would be agreeable to the neutral forum concept.
Democratic Donkeys (ADN): Yes, absolutely. We'd need to see if he is neutral before we willing surrnder our IPs
equility(ADN/Equilism): Sounds as a good plan to me
Blackbird (RLA): Is that idea amenable to the ADN? That is, requesting information?
Gamia (INDEP): Ah.
Blackbird (RLA): A branch of the Meritorcracy.
Gamia (INDEP): MIA? I am unfamiliar with them
Democratic Donkeys (ADN): That would be nice
Blackbird (RLA): You could request info from them, if you wished for a more, detailed report.
Blackbird (RLA): The MIA most likely has a file on him, he tried to join.
Gen Powell (Co-Host): That's correct, Delegate Blackbird.
Gamia (INDEP): And is doing a wonderful job, I may add
equility(ADN/Equilism): Well I know that website, I don't know the person behind the site
Gen Powell (Co-Host): NSI is taking over where the radio nations left off in NS.
Blackbird (RLA): Nuetral enough. He was a member of the Sons of Liberty.
Democratic Donkeys (ADN): So I don't know how truly neutral he is
Blackbird (RLA): I know him.
Gamia (INDEP):
www.freewebs.com/protocol101/Democratic Donkeys (ADN): Yes neither do I
equility(ADN/Equilism): So I can't really say
Gen Powell (Co-Host): Would the delegates be amenable to having the NSI create a neutral forum to address alleged violations before filing mod reports?
equility(ADN/Equilism): I don't know them
Gamia (INDEP): Anyone disagree with this idea? We could run it past him...
Gen Powell (Co-Host): Agreed.